Archive for the ‘Performance Management’ Category

Critical Success Factors: A Surprising Finding

Friday, April 16th, 2010

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

A lot has been written about critical success factors. Critical success factors are the things you must do to be successful.  I slightly cringe using the term, because it’s so over-used, but I want to share a couple of things with you about being successful that may surprise you.

First impressions are misleading:  First of all, success or the lack of it, is often a very lagging indicator.  E.g. someone may be very effective, and successful at what they do, but acknowledgement, fame or fortune may be trailing them in the distance, so you wouldn’t notice it up front. The converse is also true. We work with a number of people who have high level positions, long careers, but I wouldn’t rate them as very effective or successful people.  Bottom line, you have to look beyond “successful” people to find what the critical factors are for success.

If first impressions are misleading, recurring impressions are a pretty good indicator.  I’ve found 9 factors or enduring patterns of behavior that characterize people and organizations that are effective at what they do. Those nine factors range from use of systems, to using defined outcomes in action and speech, to keeping clear and current about current status updates and priorities.  I’ve made up a graphic scorecard you can use to rate yourself or your organization on these 9 patterns.  You can download it at http://www.managepro.com/successfactors.xls

Here’s the real curve ball.  Most of us have all been saturated with the quasi-myth that success is related to setting positive goals, positive imagery and visualization, etc.  It’s sort of true, but not nearly as highly correlated as one might think.

The truth is that most of us are not only relatively risk-adverse, but we tend to gear up for change, and yes success is a change for most of us… when we focus on the negative, not the positive.

Whether you look at:

1.  The classic comment from the movie, Network, ”I’m mad as hell, and I’m not going to take it anymore”, or

2. Behavioral research conducted by Daniel Kahneman, or

3. The pop-psychology imbued in diet theory, e.g. you “will be most successful if you’re thinking about the negative aspects of failing your goal rather than the positive….” The surprising truth is that avoiding negatives is a bigger driver for helping you be successful than positive incentives. So don’t hesitate to use the negatives in your life, they have wonderful motivational power.

Bottom Line:

There’s a number of surprising lessons to be learned about being successful at work, and at life.  Apart from learning that the people who have currently “made it” can often not be modeling what it takes to be successful,  and yes there are some practices that will help you be more successful… but the biggest sleeper is how much more powerful negatives, rather than positives, can be to motivate you to success.

How Comfort & Adaptability Affect Winning at Business

Friday, April 16th, 2010

Another thought about the role of comfort in business.  I keep being struck with how often it functions in an orthogonal, if not opposing, manner to working strategically and winning at the game of business. Hm… first sentence and I already wrote that to nicely. How about saying it this way: “Be very careful about doing or supporting others doing what’s comfortable… check that it really is aligned with working, managing strategically, with the end goal in mind… otherwise it may mean you or they will not survive.”

For a similar perspective, check out Alan Webber’s book, Rules of Thumb: 52 Truths for Winning at Business without Losing Your Self.  It seems that when we lose the sense of being in touch with survival needs, we get feeling insulated, we rationalize not needing to adapt, not needing to respond, not needing to take the extra steps.

This last week I was peering at a man’s face, as his body lay crumpled on the street, his eye fixed wide open, someone feeling for his pulse, someone else calling 911.  He had walked across a busy highway at night, instead of walking the extra 50 feet down to the light ahead of us.  He didn’t survive, but he did what was comfortable… until it suddenly wasn’t.

I worked with customers from two different governments this week.  Both are slow to get even basic strategy tracking and resulting action plans implemented.  Both would be dead on the street if they had to face a car bearing down on them.

How nimble is your business, how much does doing what’s strategic, what ensures survivability, rank over comfort?

Bottom Line:

Staying in touch with the need to survive, is a great antidote to over-emphasizing comfort in how we engage in life at work.  In fact, losing touch with survival needs makes us all too complacent, protective and non-adaptive in a world that often rewards the one who adapts the quickest.

 

The Role of Comfort in Chunking the Work Process

Friday, April 16th, 2010

I’ve been swamped with a large international project for the past few months, and blogging as well as a few other things, have all had to take a back seat. One thing I have been itching to write about it seeing how individuals manage and translate information into a preferred work style.

If you’ve read anything I’ve written, you know that I am in favor of setting clear outcome goals and then translating the embedded assumptions and action steps into a set of chunks or small deliverables.  Why?  For me it’s all about what helps people be most effective.  But that has to do with what drives me, which is likely not what drives you. That’s what this blog is about today.  It’s about what drives you and how that affects your work.

Lately I realize how much we are all driven by something.  For me its a number of things, including getting to make an impact, use my gifts and tools in my toolbox, having the opportunity to knock the ball out of the park, working smart and working with people I enjoy. But perhaps the biggest insight lately is to realize how much achievement drives my behavior… and doesn’t drive lots of other people.  Oh, its not that people don’t want to work, or get things accomplished, it’s just that achievement isn’t the largest or prominent driver for them. Guess what is.  What would you say drives most of the world at work? What I keep noticing is that comfort or the avoidance of discomfort is the

biggest shaper for how most people I work with around the world behave. It permeates the choices we all make, even effecting how we manage information and approach chunking projects and deliverables into a set of daily tasks. Take managing information and working projects for instance.  I find myself driven by wanting to adopt what works best, and I’m constantly checking or cross checking if we’re on a trajectory to hit the outcome, and if not I want to make a course correction.  Why?  Because that’s what I am most comfortable with. For many, what emerges is a different pattern, one where comfort isn’t tied to cross checking to see if they are on track, but instead to verify that they are operating in a known pattern, and justifying that position if needed.  Here are a couple of examples:

1. Some people are most comfortable in managing information and work by approaching it in what I call the “librarian” style.  Whether they use post-it notes or have an elaborate coding system, they approach comfort at work as a state in which everything is identified, categorized, defined…   Having a developed taxonomy is their way of chunking the work process.

2. Other people approach work and information by limiting their focus to the next task.  What’s next, what do you want me to do?  There is no over-arching categorization.  Managing work and the information in it is most comfortable when perceived as a rolodex of todos, which when one is finished, you just turn to the next.

3.  Still others are most comfortable when they dive deeply into the details, scenarios, implications and deeper recesses of possibilities.  They enjoy gathering and stating knowledge, writing technical manuals, knowing the theory, and the theorist’s name.  Comfort is the ability to know and be able to declare a lot.

Bottom Line:

It pays to take a look at what shapes your comfort meter, as it significantly drives your behavior at work and ultimately your outcomes.  It would be strategic of you to ask yourself this question as we embark on another year… “Is what I comfortably adopt as a work style, and information management style, really related to being successful?  Or does my comfort meter get in the way of my ability to accomplish what I want… or say I want?”

PST bares the truth about Technology & Performance Management – (1of4)

Tuesday, January 27th, 2009

Delivering a performance management system can generate tremendous results.  We’ve seen it deliver hundreds of millions of dollars in value in months.  Today it has become an important tool in building an organizational culture of choice, and delivering great results. 

What we’ve also witnessed is that it is relatively uncommon for organizations to have a good “road map” when embarking on setting up or executing a performance management system.  This series of three white papers is written as a guide to help you avoid common mistakes and address critical steps in dealing with the people, process and technology side of performance management.
 

This white paper is about the technology component of performance management.  There are many options in the market, all focusing on the common deliverables of setting and tracking goals, objectives and KPI’s (key performance indicators).  What we would like to accomplish in this paper, is to focus upon a few important keys in determining how to approach using performance management technology.

Before we get started in this area, let’s first get one common misconception out of the way.  Software is part of the solution, it’s not the solution.  It doesn’t make people change their work habits, but it sure helps manage the process. Given that software is an enabling tool; let’s talk about four key steps to assist you in being a success with performance management software:
Technology and Performance Management:  It’s a lot easier when powered by software
1. Less is More

This is very important to understand.  Our first step, when considering what information to address and track in a performance management tool like ManagePro or MProWeb, is simply this – be brief, ¬start with a little to make a lot of progress.  Start by tracking only the top 3 to 6 performance management objectives and projects that most impact your bottom line and/or business plan.

• Learning in small chunks establishes early wins, user comfort, satisfaction and sense of accomplishment.  Minimally you need clear goals, a scorecard setup with metrics for each goal, and a place to track progress updates on a weekly or monthly basis.
• The key is to deliver better outcomes, not have one system that organizes and tracks every possible activity.
• Users who try to put everything and the “kitchen sink” into the software for comprehensive tracking, commonly report “drowning in the data”.  Avoid making this mistake.

Good decision and performance management benefits from a focus that frugally addresses those actions and the resulting consequences that drive outcome.  The key is to be able to focus on the critical pattern that drives the system, the outcome, etc… and to be able get that information into performance measures that are updated promptly and consistently.  Dive into the use of technology with an approach that emphasizes managing the information that’s most critical to your success, not creating the next library of congress.

This is part three of a three part series addressing the People, Process and Technology aspects of performance management.  You can find the two accompanying issues at…
http://www.managepro.com/resources.white.papers.html.

The author of this series, Rodney Brim, is CEO of Performance Solutions Technology (PST).  PST develops and assists organizations in deploying performance management software solutions, and presents these guidelines based upon our work with 1,000’s of companies to help ensure your success and avoid common myths in the pursuit of performance management.  Performance Solutions Technology is found on the web at http://www.PerformanceSolutionsTech.com

PST bares the truth about Technology & Performance Management – (2of4)

Tuesday, January 27th, 2009

This white paper is about the technology component of performance management.  There are many options in the market, all focusing on the common deliverables of setting and tracking goals, objectives and KPI’s (key performance indicators).  What we would like to accomplish in this paper, is to focus upon a few important keys in determining how to approach using performance management technology.

Technology and Performance Management:  It’s a lot easier when powered by software

2.  Identify and Respond to Process Mis-Match

You will be way ahead of the game if, before implementing a technology solution, you take a moment to assess whether the technology adoption will simply build on existing work practices or require new ones.   Technology solutions are easier to implement when they support established practices.  But what happens if using the software requires the user to do something they don’t currently?  What if, in the pursuit of high performance, the implementation of technology is but a small part of a larger change effort?

If this is the case, you have a process mis-match and will be using the software to drive major change in addition to setting up a performance management system.  If that’s the case, recognize and resource it as such – because it’s going to take more time and effort.  To drive change, you’ll need planning, resources, time and money.  We probably don’t need to mention this, but as we mentioned above, change does not get implemented by installing software on someone’s PC. 

Technology that involves change, especially change that requires new work habits, requires lots of follow-up.  It requires lots of practice and being held accountable to both practice the new process and deliver the new outcomes. Some suggest that you should roughly estimate resources for a technology enabled change process in the range of 10% for hardware, 20% for software and 70% for training and coaching.  Establishing improved performance using new work habits seems to match the general literature on habit change.  Experts suggest it takes practicing the new behavior 21 days in a row before it becomes the new habit – otherwise the tendency is to revert back to the old behavior.

This is part three of a three part series addressing the People, Process and Technology aspects of performance management.  You can find the two accompanying issues at…
http://www.managepro.com/resources.white.papers.html.

The author of this series, Rodney Brim, is CEO of Performance Solutions Technology (PST).  PST develops and assists organizations in deploying performance management software solutions, and presents these guidelines based upon our work with 1,000’s of companies to help ensure your success and avoid common myths in the pursuit of performance management.  Performance Solutions Technology is found on the web at http://www.PerformanceSolutionsTech.com

PST bares the truth about Technology & Performance Management – (3of4)

Tuesday, January 27th, 2009

This white paper is about the technology component of performance management.  There are many options in the market, all focusing on the common deliverables of setting and tracking goals, objectives and KPI’s (key performance indicators).  What we would like to accomplish in this paper, is to focus upon a few important keys in determining how to approach using performance management technology.

Technology and Performance Management:  It’s a lot easier when powered by software

3. Make sure the Performance Management Software selection you make has the required basics:

Lots of performance management tools have shared and unique feature sets.  Make sure your selection has those feature sets that support the psychology of high performance.  We’ve listed some of the more important ones you should consider.

Performance Management Checklist

 

1. Are the top performance management goals tied to the strategic plan, easily viewed from one screen and easily tracked with updated metrics?
 

 

2. Are the key action steps (plan) or milestones for each goal or KPI easily identifiable and tracked?
 

 

3. Do all top level initiatives and goals receive regular progress updates for immediate drill down and review in staff meetings?
 

 

4. Can each person see the context for the projects and tasks they are working on, such that the connection to top level goals and the strategic plan is visible? 

 

This is part three of a three part series addressing the People, Process and Technology aspects of performance management.  You can find the two accompanying issues at…
http://www.managepro.com/resources.white.papers.html.

The author of this series, Rodney Brim, is CEO of Performance Solutions Technology (PST).  PST develops and assists organizations in deploying performance management software solutions, and presents these guidelines based upon our work with 1,000’s of companies to help ensure your success and avoid common myths in the pursuit of performance management.  Performance Solutions Technology is found on the web at http://www.PerformanceSolutionsTech.com

PST bares the truth about Technology & Performance Management – (4of4)

Tuesday, January 27th, 2009

This white paper is about the technology component of performance management.  There are many options in the market, all focusing on the common deliverables of setting and tracking goals, objectives and KPI’s (key performance indicators).  What we would like to accomplish in this paper, is to focus upon a few important keys in determining how to approach using performance management technology.

Technology and Performance Management:  It’s a lot easier when powered by software

4. Resource and Be Firm when deploying performance management technology

It has been estimated that 2/3’s of all complex technology solutions, such as CRM, ERP and Performance Management result in less than successful outcomes.  Implementing a complex technology-enabled solution is a worthwhile, but significant challenge.  PST provides a number of resources for planning a successful implementation, but for now, here are two final tips to keep you headed in the right direction:

Plan and resource the implementation process appropriately.  This is not a process of installing software and one training session and magically you suddenly have a high performance work system.  A system in which people actively collaborate, track their progress, document their results, and daily manage information well.  Understand the context into which you are deploying this solution, which includes the amount of change being requested, the technology skills and motivational drivers of the new users.

Burn your ships when you go ashore.  By this we mean once you start the campaign, don’t continue to use technology tools that conflict with the new technology you’re introducing.  This is especially true in meetings.  Meetings are a key “make it or break it” proving ground for performance technology.  Choose and use a performance management technology that extends to managing meetings as well as performance goals and objectives.  If you continue to use general office tools to manage status updates, you risk creating an obstacle and conflict with the performance management software utilization and implementation.

This is part three of a three part series addressing the People, Process and Technology aspects of performance management.  You can find the two accompanying issues at…
http://www.managepro.com/resources.white.papers.html.

The author of this series, Rodney Brim, is CEO of Performance Solutions Technology (PST).  PST develops and assists organizations in deploying performance management software solutions, and presents these guidelines based upon our work with 1,000’s of companies to help ensure your success and avoid common myths in the pursuit of performance management.  Performance Solutions Technology is found on the web at http://www.PerformanceSolutionsTech.com

PST bares the truth about Process and Performance Management – (1of2)

Tuesday, January 27th, 2009

Delivering a performance management system can deliver tremendous results.  We’ve seen it deliver hundreds of millions of dollars in value in months.  Today it has become an important tool in building an organizational culture of choice, and delivering great results. 

What we’ve also witnessed is that it’s not very common to have a good “road map” when embarking on setting up or executing a performance management system.  This series of three white papers is written as a guide to help you avoid common mistakes and address critical steps in dealing with the people, process and technology side of performance management.
 
This particular white paper addresses three core processes that will help you be successful in implementing and maintaining a performance management system.   Three important core processes that you will need to launch and navigate to successfully execute your plan.  We’ve written it in a style that brief and succinct to make it easy to get your arms around each process.   Let’s get started:

Process and Performance Management

1.  Our first process has to do with the questions you ask.  It is as important as running to first base… first, after hitting the ball when you play baseball.  Performance management (pm) works best when you have answered two very important questions.  Those questions are simply, “Why” and “What’s in it for me”?  You know we just said it works best if you answer these questions, but that’s actually too mild of a statement.  It should be a mandatory step in your approach. 

You may be asking, “Why are these questions mandatory”?  Here’s the brief answer – there’s no pm solution that can succeed based upon its merit and capability, without the benefit of solving personal problems for users.  Like politics, performance management is always local.

By-the-way, most performance management initiators have not taken the time (sometimes faced the discomfort) to identify the problem and figure out how much it costs them before they set out to obtain a performance management solution. 

Why not?  Partly because it seems so very human to figure out “there’s got to be a better way”, but not get clear of what isn’t working about the current system.   To help you avoid this miss-step, let’s go over how to address both questions.

• Answering the Why? Question.  Starting into a performance management program without establishing the “Why” in very clear and personal terms, results in feeling like a solution is being forced on the workforce, a solution without a real necessity.  Solutions without a problem inevitably feel, and are treated, as a burden and shed at the first sign of requirement relaxation.  Bottom Line:  Establishing “Why” is critical.  It needs to be personal; for some it will be uncomfortably honest, it needs to be revealing, exposing.  It’s the basis for establishing the reason for the mission.  Let’s move to “What’s in it for me.”

• What’s in it for me?  If establishing “Why” is the push motivator, establishing “What’s in it for me?” is the pull motivator.  You’ll want to use both positive, (what’s in it for me) incentives for higher performance (ex. increased compensation, free time, autonomy, job security etc.) and the reduction of negative (why) experiences (ex. less frustration, less time wasted, less worry). 

Clearly performance management needs to be defined as something that benefits everyone involved, not just upper management.  Raising performance just isn’t sustainable if done only under coercion or pressure to comply, even if the “Barbarians are at the gate.”

This is part two of a three part series addressing the People, Process and Technology aspects of performance management.  You can find the two accompanying issues at…
http://www.managepro.com/resources.white.papers.html.

The author of this series, Rodney Brim, is CEO of Performance Solutions Technology (PST).  PST develops ManagePro software and assists organizations in deploying performance management software solutions, and presents these guidelines based upon our work with 1,000’s of companies to help ensure your success and avoid common myths in the pursuit of performance management.  Performance Solutions Technology is found on the web at http://www.PerformanceSolutionsTech.com

PST bares the truth about Process and Performance Management – (2of2)

Tuesday, January 27th, 2009

This particular white paper addresses three core processes that will help you be successful in implementing and maintaining a performance management system.   Three important core processes that you will need to launch and navigate to successfully execute your plan.  We’ve written it in a style that brief and succinct to make it easy to get your arms around each process.

Process and Performance Management

2.  Performance management needs performance metrics – period.  For the majority of organizations, that means you need to track metrics that presently aren’t being tracked and you may not even be sure what or how to track.  If failing to establish “Why” and “What’s in it for me” is the first, most obvious mistake, not establishing metrics is the second biggest mistake you must avoid.  Be sure to set aside time and resources to establish how you’re going to measure the performance improvement.  Track metrics that have what’s called “face validity” (e.g. makes common sense, clearly tied to valued outcomes).  Finally, take the time to measure your performance indicators before you start the performance improvement process, otherwise you won’t have a baseline for comparison purposes.

3.  The final process issue we want to address works best if you look at culture and current work levels as a set of habits.  Performance improvement is essentially the development of new habits.  It needs to be built into a daily process, a daily system for operating.  It needs to match up to the simple statement; “If we practice the following new operating habits, we expect to reduce the following experiences (as measured by) and increase the following positive outcomes (as measured by).”  By identifying the process as habits, you will avoid the mistake of setting up the solution as a “silver bullet” and effectively reinforce the concept that it will take practice before the new (higher performance) behaviors will become the customary way to do business.
This is part two of a three part series addressing the People, Process and Technology aspects of performance management.  You can find the two accompanying issues at…
http://www.managepro.com/resources.white.papers.html.

The author of this series, Rodney Brim, is CEO of Performance Solutions Technology (PST).  PST develops ManagePro software and assists organizations in deploying performance management software solutions, and presents these guidelines based upon our work with 1,000’s of companies to help ensure your success and avoid common myths in the pursuit of performance management.  Performance Solutions Technology is found on the web at http://www.PerformanceSolutionsTech.com

PST bares the truth about People and Performance Management myths & reality – (1of4)

Tuesday, January 27th, 2009

A well executed performance management system can deliver tremendous results.  We’ve seen it deliver hundreds of millions of dollars in value in months.  Today it has become an important tool in building an organizational culture of choice, and delivering great results. 

What we’ve also witnessed is that it’s not very common to have a good “road map” when embarking on setting up or executing a performance management system.  This series of three white papers is written as a guide to help you avoid common mistakes and address critical steps in dealing with the people, process and technology side of performance management.
 
This white paper series addresses belief systems and expectations about how people will respond to the introduction of a performance management software system.  Each guideline is described in terms of a myth (inaccurate belief system that will get you into trouble) and reality.  The expectation is that by helping you adopt an accurate perspective, it will guide the rest of your approach, expectations and approach towards a successful outcome.  Let’s get started:

1.  Understand that performance management is really a nice term for the reality of a gritty, unending push for high performance.  Think about it, no one spends money on performance management with the goal of reaching mediocre performance.  For the rest of this white paper, translate the word performance management into the climb, the drive, the engagement and negotiation through resistance in pursuit of improved performance. 

For some the thought of creating higher performance looks like a palm-sweating battle.   It can certainly have that at times.  It also has times where you get a tremendous sense of accomplishment and relief as obstacles are removed.  Inevitably it has both a push and pull component.  Let me explain. 

You generate a pull that draws people to higher performance when you remove their discomforting obstacles and clearly identify what’s in it for them.  You generate a push when you enroll one or more people to lend their support, the power of their position, and ultimately their insistence with others when being tested, that “Yes, we are going to use the new processes and tools required to achieve a higher level of performance.” 

          Myth: Performance Management is an easy-to-apply improvement process.
          Reality: Performance Management is a gritty push for people to perform higher than they have previously to date.

This is part one of a three part series addressing the People, Process and Technology aspects of performance management.  You can find the other issues at…
http://www.managepro.com/resources.white.papers.html.

The author of this series, Rodney Brim, is CEO of Performance Solutions Technology (PST).  PST develops and assists organizations in deploying performance management software solutions, and presents these guidelines based upon our work with 1,000’s of companies to help ensure your success and avoid common myths in the pursuit of performance management.  Performance Solutions Technology is found on the web at http://www.PerformanceSolutionsTech.com